Richmond upon Thames Liberal Democrats

Covering the constituencies of Twickenham and Richmond Park

243 Billion Litres Of Raw Sewage Dumped Into Thames In Last 4 Years

10.36.00am GMT Tue 21st Dec 2004

Shocking new figures revealed today by Susan Kramer, Liberal Democrat Prospective Parliamentary Candidate (Richmond Park), shows that more than 240 million cubic metres of raw sewage were pumped into the Thames in the last four years.

The new figures, revealed in Parliamentary answers, show that between January 2001 and November 2004, 243,439,000 cubic metres of untreated sewage was released into the river. This equates to 243,439,000,000 litres. Kramer today called on Ministers at the Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs to reverse their decision to postpone the 'interceptor' tunnel that would prevent the need for raw sewage to be regularly pumped into the Thames. Over the last fifteen years Thames

clear up costs have cost more than £1billion.

Kramer said:-"These figures are an absolute disgrace. So much sewage being pumped into the Thames is bad for the environment, bad for human health and bad for the image of both the Thames and London.

"This dumping of sewage into the river hits areas like Richmond and Kingston especially hard. We live both with the filth in the water and, when the wind is right, the disgusting smell from Mogden.

"The dumping of raw sewage into the Thames is something that happened in the Victorian era. It certainly should not be happening in the 21st century in one of the most developed capital cities in the world.

"It is incredible that despite all the predictions that global warming would cause more violent storms and heavier downpours, London's sewer system is totally unprepared and unable to cope.

"There must be no more discussion, delay or dithering on building this interceptor tunnel. The longer Ministers drag their feet in making the inevitable decision to build the tunnel, the more this will ultimately cost the taxpayer to build and more raw sewage will be pumped into the Thames."

Notes to editor:

The quote and table below is taken from Hansard 15 Dec 2004 : Column 1112W "The Table below sets out the monthly calculated volumes of untreated sewage discharged to the Thames from the five largest pumping stations during wet weather. As no data is available for the other overflows along the Thames Tideway, it is estimated that on average these volumes represent 60 per cent. of the total discharge from London's combined drainage system at these times.

Month 2001 2002 2003 2004

Jan 3,471,000 3,009,000 12,954,000 9,281,000

Feb 9,279,000 4,746,000 3,759,000 3,240,000

March 8,118,000 2,761,000 743,000 44,000

April 2,688,000 2,662,000 395,000 3,665,000

May 2,322,000 2,007,000 543,000 3,268,000

June 1,757,000 3,353,000 950,000 3,047,000

July 1,742,000 1,962,000 1,124,000 1,260,000

August 4,490,000 4,017,000 438,000 4,945,000

Sept 2,261,000 563,000 577,000 446,000

October 6,312,000 3,961,000 2,600,000 4,290,000

Nov 2,400,000 12,144,000 11,072,000 304,000

Dec 1,096,000 11,755,000 6,064,000 n/a

This gives a total for the 5 largest pumping of 173,885,000 cubic metres discharged between Jan '01 - Nov '04. Ministers estimate this makes up 60% of untreated sewage going into the Thames and comes from the 5 largest pumping stations at Beckton, Crossness, Long Reach, Mogden and Riverside. Therefore the total raw sewage discharge for the Thames equals 243,439,000 cubic metres. A cubic metre is equal to 1,000 litres. Therefore 243,439,000,000 litres of raw sewage has been discharged into the Thames since January 2001- On Monday 4th October DEFRA published its final water pricing review and

guidance and concluded:-

"2.5. The Government recognised in the Principal Guidance that the Thames Tideway needs further measures to address discharges. In the medium term, improvements to continuous waste water discharges from three sewage treatment works which discharge to the Thames ensure compliance ensurecompliance with statutory requirements under the Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive are to go ahead. In addition, there will be further schemes to improve water quality in the river and protect fish under the local schemes programme in the RIA (see paragraph 3.20).

2.6. With respect to intermittent discharges from combined sewer overflows to the Thames Tideway, the Principal Guidance noted that work was being carried out by Thames Water and the Environment Agency to inform decisions. While the proposed interceptor tunnel might still emerge as the most appropriate long-term solution, the Government has since decided that, bearing in mind the scale, the costs and the long implementation timescale, further consideration is necessary before

decisions are reached. The Government has therefore asked Thames Water and the Environment Agency to undertake further work on the interceptor tunnel proposal and on other measures that might be alternative or additional. This further work is to include smaller-scale measures and those that could bring earlier improvements on intermittent discharges, robustness of the system and emergencies"- Thames Water spent £4million on a study, which revealed that the establishment of the interceptor tunnel would take about ten years to build and cost £1.5billion.

Bookmark this story at: del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg FacebookFacebook redditreddit StumbleUponStumbleUpon
Print this news story
Previous news story: MP Praises Local Royal Mail Staff (Fri 17th Dec 2004).
Next news story: Growing Concern Over Crane Valley Development Plans (Thu 30th Dec 2004).

Related News Stories:

Fri 8th Oct 2004:

Tue 5th Oct 2004:

Printed and hosted by Prater Raines Ltd, 82b Sandgate High Street, Folkestone CT20 3BX.
Published and promoted by Chris Squire on behalf of the Richmond upon Thames Liberal Democrats, 2a Lion Road, Twickenham, TW1 4JQ
The views expressed are those of the party, not of the service provider.